| | |||||||
| Notices |
| Groundfishing Cod, Pollock, Haddock, Cusk, Redfish, Wolfish, and all those southern species. |
What have you got to say about the topic of: "Do somthing about Dogfish !!!!!!". Here's how is started: "I quote myself:"A directed, unregulated fishery until they are no longer commercially viable" (ok, so "
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #11 | ||
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Quincy, Ma.
Posts: 121
| I quote myself:"A directed, unregulated fishery until they are no longer commercially viable" (ok, so its not word for word but you get the point, KILL THEM!). At least that will trim down the numbers so groundfish CAN come back.............JC | ||
| | |
| | #12 | ||
| NBS Member Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Forked River NJ
Posts: 2
| This may be a stupid question. What if I as a recreational fisherman killed every dogfish that I hooked?
__________________ 33 Blackfin Combi Volvo diesels 28 Mako 250 Verado's | ||
| | |
| | #13 | ||
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Quincy, Ma.
Posts: 121
| Hell, it costs more to produce ethonal than the price of gas, it isn't good for our engines, gets poorer performance and yet "our goverment" subsidizes the producers so we can stretch our oil supply (I'm sure they have a "darker" motive). Perhaps the same people who thought that up could put all that brainpower to work subsidizing commercial fishermen to catch dogfish. I heard that people in North Korea are starving, why don't we give them a bunch of free, low cost protien (dogfish) so they don't produce atomic bombs?...JC | ||
| | |
| | #14 | |||
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: CT / Summer in RI
Posts: 3,114
| Quote:
What do we do? The only thing we can, continue to pressure the regulatory agencies, albeit likely in vane. Being responsible fishermen these days requires political action if we want any type of fishery available for our children. | |||
| | |
| | #15 | ||
| NBS Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: CapeCod
Posts: 144
| I guess that was what i was trying to get at though...i don't think killing the dogfish will do anything other than kill the dogfish. this in itself doesn't bother me, but it also is not going to bring back the cod. that's my point...dogfish are here because cod (for example) aren't...not the other way around. at least that's my impression. here is the bottom line question...do you think if you snapped your fingers and made the dogs vanish the cod would then come back? why? | ||
| | |
| | #16 | |||
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Quincy, Ma.
Posts: 121
| Quote:
Because the dogfish are CONSUMING the codfish (and 80% of all other groundfish too).............JC | |||
| | |
| | #17 | |||
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Exeter, Rhode Island
Posts: 3,637
| Quote:
Exactly! AND because they are "protected"......totally backwards! After this past year's offshore season, sharking, cod-fishing....everything, couldn't keep a bait in the water! They eat everything in their path! And they "blanket" the ocean floor! :cwm21:
__________________ | |||
| | |
| | #18 | ||
| NBS Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: CapeCod
Posts: 144
| i am not debating that there are tons of dogfish and you can't chum for anything without being surrounded by them. i think we can all agree on that. what i'm saying is what is the root cause? Capt Colby says the dogs eat all the cod. this would be news to me (i am in no way saying it isn't correct, just saying i have never heard this before). it seems to me that this is a 'recent' problem, i.e. something has changed over the past 50 years to cause the problem, and until you correct that, you haven't done anything other than kill the dogs. which might make you feel better but not solve the problem? i am admitting ignorance on the subject and i'm trying to become educated...if the dogs are (only recently) eating all the cod, why? why didn't they eat all the cod 500 years ago? it seems like we're missing the root cause. | ||
| | |
| | #19 | |||
![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Quincy, Ma.
Posts: 121
| Quote:
I should stop at your "admission", but in case anyone else is "confused" I will give some details: 1.Groundfish (including cod) are at historical lows in abundance. The "fishacrats" allow the commercial sector to continue wiping out all they can/put more restrictions on recreational anglers. 2.A few years back (7 or 8?) our "fishacrats" figured that because dogfish were at a "low", they completely shut down the commercial fishery. The doggies, as we all know, rebounded fameously. 3.(2006)Scientists evaluating the Gulf of Maine estimate that dogfish are eating about 80% of all juvinile groundfish. 4.500 years? The timeframe for all this is NOW........JC | |||
| | |
| | #20 | |||
![]() Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Exeter, Rhode Island
Posts: 3,637
| Quote:
Which is what I was getting at in my post a couple above this.
__________________ | |||
| | |
| Ads Do NOT Show To Registered Members | |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| dogfish, somthing |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |